Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Doc7505, Nov 13, 2019.

  1. Doc7505
    Offline

    Doc7505 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2016
    Messages:
    1,629
    Thanks Received:
    723
    Trophy Points:
    395
    Ratings:
    +3,265



    Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…
    11/13/2019
    Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik and John Ratcliffe methodically deconstructed the false premise advanced by the impeachment crew. It became clear that both Kent and Taylor held no specific and direct knowledge of the substance behind the claims made by the democrats leading the effort.
    Jordan pressed Taylor on how he came to have a “clear understanding” that the U.S. aid to Ukraine was dependent on opening an investigation into Trump’s political rivals. Jordan said there was no “linkage” and Ambassador Taylor said he came to his “clear conclusion” based on what other people said about what other people heard about conversations with other people.
    Next up John Ratcliffe: Rep. Ratcliffe reviewed multiple public statements made by Ukrainian President Zelensky that he was not pressured by the U.S. and had no knowledge of military aid being withheld from Ukraine.
    Then Elise Stefanik brings it home by outlining Burisma: Rep. Stefanik focused on both officials’ statements on the corruption in Ukraine and Burisma:


    Comment:
    Kent and Taylor are in a very sad situation, both blinded by their false superiority or at least profoundly duped by their Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA handlers. Their government careers are destroyed. Taylor is old enough to retire with a full pension. After today, maybe he got the hint. On the other hand Kent will most likely move on to academia and spoon feed the youngsters with zombie brains.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 4
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Claudette
    Offline

    Claudette Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    35,207
    Thanks Received:
    5,542
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +24,601
    I heard exactly what they heard. A whole lot of hearsay. The Dems are paving the way for a Trump win in 2020.

    What a bunch of imbeciles.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. Billiejeens
    Online

    Billiejeens VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2019
    Messages:
    2,575
    Thanks Received:
    294
    Trophy Points:
    65
    Ratings:
    +1,805
    On the other hand Kent will most likely move on to academia and spoon feed the youngsters with zombie brains. -


    yep
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
  4. wamose
    Offline

    wamose Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2019
    Messages:
    2,405
    Thanks Received:
    433
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +3,086
    Democrats are a little unstable. They will believe anything and that's what makes them so easy to con. So when somebody with bugged out eyes, which seems to be a new Democratic trait, interprets a sentence to mean something it couldn't possibly mean, all the little lemmings say AHA!! Too crazy. This glove don't fit so you must acquit.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. RealDave
    Offline

    RealDave Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2016
    Messages:
    22,456
    Thanks Received:
    2,342
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +14,154
    If you hear two people talking & report what you heard, it is not hearsay.
     
    • Funny Funny x 5
  6. Jitss617
    Online

    Jitss617 Gold Member

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2019
    Messages:
    17,644
    Thanks Received:
    1,518
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +10,968
    Who heard what?
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  7. Billiejeens
    Online

    Billiejeens VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2019
    Messages:
    2,575
    Thanks Received:
    294
    Trophy Points:
    65
    Ratings:
    +1,805



    Democrats are a little unstable

    hmm
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  8. Claudette
    Offline

    Claudette Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    35,207
    Thanks Received:
    5,542
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +24,601
    The only way it isn't hearsay is if the two people you heard tell authorities. Its hearsay if its repeated by someone who is just repeating what they heard.

    Hell. Hearsay isn't even legal in a court of law.

    Hearsay is hearsay as much as you hate to admit it. LOL
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2019
  9. MAGAman
    Offline

    MAGAman Pro-American Patriot Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2019
    Messages:
    4,635
    Thanks Received:
    670
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Realville, USA
    Ratings:
    +4,445
    Hahaha

    hear·say
    /ˈhirˌsā/
    noun
    1. information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.
      "according to hearsay, Bob had managed to break his arm"

    Keep digging
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  10. EvMetro
    Offline

    EvMetro VIP Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2017
    Messages:
    910
    Thanks Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Ratings:
    +881

    Hearsay is the report of another person's words by a witness. Hearsay is just gossip.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1

Share This Page