House votes to enhance border security...in Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Tunisia. Blocks USA security.

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Nostra, Nov 11, 2019.

  1. Nostra
    Offline

    Nostra VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2019
    Messages:
    1,786
    Thanks Received:
    266
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +1,728
    Another shining example of just how un-American the Dimwinger party is.

    $1.3 TRILLION for border security in the ME, and specifically bans spending anything for a border wall on the US border. And not one dime for more Border Patrol agents

    Nazi Pelousy and the Dimwingers are America hating scum.




    The Democrat-controlled House of Representatives has voted to fund efforts to "enhance the border security" of Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt and Tunisia while moving to deny all funding to build walls, fencing or any other structures to enhance the border security of the United States.


    Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her lieutenants have their priorities.

    To them, borders on the other side of the world are more important than our own.

    On June 19, the House approved a massive spending bill. In an act of legislative polygamy, it "married" the appropriations bill for the Department of Defense to the appropriations bills for the Department of State, the Department of Energy, and the departments of Labor, Health and Human Services and Education.

    The Congressional Budget Office estimated this monstrosity would cost taxpayers $984.7 billion in fiscal 2020.

    Yet there is one thing on which this bill would forbid the Trump administration from spending one penny to accomplish.

    On page 304 (of 650), it says: "None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act or any prior Department of Defense appropriations Acts may be used to construct a wall, fence, border barriers, or border security infrastructure along the southern land border of the United States."

    A month later, the House Appropriations Committee sent the full House a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security.

    This bill -- so far -- is unmarried and would cost taxpayers $63.8 billion.

    President Trump had requested that it include $5 billion to use in constructing barriers at the border.

    How much did the committee give him?


    "No funding is provided in the bill for new physical barriers along the southwest border," said the committee report.

    It also said, "The recommendation provides no funding for additional Border Patrol Agents."


    Thus, the Democrat-controlled House is advancing discretionary appropriations bills that would spend more than $1 trillion in one year but provide zero dollars to build physical barriers to stop illegal aliens, human traffickers and drug smugglers from crossing our southern border.


    Yet that does not mean the Democrat-controlled House is not planning to spend some money to enhance border security.

    It just depends where the border is.

    In that 650-page spending bill that prohibits Defense Department money from being used to defend the southern border of the United States, there is a section that creates a $1.295 billion fund for use by the secretary of defense.

    "For the 'Counter-Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Train and Equip Fund', $1,295,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2021," says the bill. "Provided, That such funds shall be available to the secretary of defense in coordination with the Secretary of State, to provide assistance, including training; equipment; logistics support, supplies, and services; stipends; infrastructure repair and renovation; and sustainment, to foreign security forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals participating, or preparing to participate in activities to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, and their affiliated or associated groups."

    House Votes to 'Enhance the Border Security' of Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt and Tunisia -- Not the USA
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. RealDave
    Online

    RealDave Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2016
    Messages:
    22,324
    Thanks Received:
    2,334
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +14,083
    Jesus fuck they voted against Trump's wall. That's it. What part of that can't you stupid assfucks get?
     
  3. Nostra
    Offline

    Nostra VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2019
    Messages:
    1,786
    Thanks Received:
    266
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +1,728
    And $1.3 TRILLION for border security in the ME.


    Hey assfuck, learn to read, assfuck.

    It also said, "The recommendation provides no funding for additional Border Patrol Agents."
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  4. Kilroy2
    Offline

    Kilroy2 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2018
    Messages:
    1,356
    Thanks Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Ratings:
    +651
    Really the bill specifically did not allow Trump to steal money for a wall that they did not fund.

    The Congress controls the spending and they allocated funds accordingly

    Trump redirects money to a wall that he is hoping will get him re elected. Money that is sent to various sources to do there job

    Taking money from the military, whatever happen to that pro military stance that repubs are so fond off

    Takes money from FEMA for disaster relief because the border is more important than helping people recovering from a disaster

    why would the military need the money when trump as decided the wall needs it more

    Money is to go fight ISIS

    The last I heard they were the enemy so this money is for defense of the US but obviously only repubs take it that the wall the wall the wall not being built

    Still this money is being is being used for defense of the US by supporting countries to fight ISIS so that maybe we don't have too

    This is something all presidents despite political orientation have done in fighting the perceived enemy which is the real threat

    only repubs would try to deflect the subject with that illegal aliens are a bigger threat than ISIS

    Yet when Trump order that hit on a ISIS leader, he claimed it was bigger than the hit on Bin Laden

    You could almost hear the pat on the back from repubs for a job well done

    Yet he didn't tell congress because for some reason he believed they would warn the guy
     
  5. Nostra
    Offline

    Nostra VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2019
    Messages:
    1,786
    Thanks Received:
    266
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +1,728
    Your delusional TDS rant means nothing.

    The topic is the fact Nazi Pelousy and the Dimwingers funded border security in the ME, gave Americans the middle finger.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. depotoo
    Offline

    depotoo Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Messages:
    34,130
    Thanks Received:
    7,835
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Ratings:
    +24,197
    I hope this spreads far and wide.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Kilroy2
    Offline

    Kilroy2 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2018
    Messages:
    1,356
    Thanks Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Ratings:
    +651


    Don't you mean that my truth doesn't agree with your rant of what happen

    if you disagree , tell me why
    ISIS is not a problem
     
  8. Nostra
    Offline

    Nostra VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2019
    Messages:
    1,786
    Thanks Received:
    266
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +1,728
    Not what I mean at all. Learn to read.

    And ISIS is the "JV Team". Heard it from an expert.
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  9. Nostra
    Offline

    Nostra VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2019
    Messages:
    1,786
    Thanks Received:
    266
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +1,728
    I didn’t see anything about it on CNN and MSDNC.
     
  10. depotoo
    Offline

    depotoo Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Messages:
    34,130
    Thanks Received:
    7,835
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Ratings:
    +24,197
    Of course not! Would they report real news?
    It’s gonna have to be done through the internet.
     

Share This Page