If you support gun manufactures being sued you will support this

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by bigrebnc1775, Jan 3, 2020.

  1. bigrebnc1775
    Offline

    bigrebnc1775 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    72,083
    Thanks Received:
    4,782
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Ratings:
    +10,084
    Any place that does not allow a person to lawfully carry a firearm should be sued if someone misuses a firearm that causes another to be harmed or killed. How say you?
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Funny Funny x 2
  2. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    53,326
    Thanks Received:
    11,089
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +38,449
    So much for conservatives’ advocacy of property rights.

    The politics of firearms illustrates well the inconsistency and hypocrisy common to most on the right.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. bigrebnc1775
    Offline

    bigrebnc1775 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    72,083
    Thanks Received:
    4,782
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Ratings:
    +10,084
    So you don't support Remington being sued?
     
  4. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    53,326
    Thanks Received:
    11,089
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +38,449
    Conservatives oppose public accommodation laws allowing patrons to sue a business owner who discriminates against his customers – public accommodations laws with provisions for sexual orientation in particular – claiming such laws violate private property rights.

    If a business owner should be allowed to refuse to sell a wedding cake to a same-sex couple without being sued for refusing to do so, a business owner should likewise be allowed to prohibit firearms on his private property without being subject to a lawsuit.

    Conservatives can’t have it both ways.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. bigrebnc1775
    Offline

    bigrebnc1775 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    72,083
    Thanks Received:
    4,782
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Ratings:
    +10,084
    LOL I'm not a Conservative. I do have some Conservative views
    I'm more of a Lincoln Republican
    So you oppose Remington being sued?
    It does appear you are wanting it both ways.
     
  6. satrebil
    Offline

    satrebil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,986
    Thanks Received:
    578
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +2,767

    As much as I hate to agree with one of the resident leftist dumbkopfs, he's right. Property rights should and must reign supreme. They are the foundation of any and every form of democracy.
     
  7. bigrebnc1775
    Offline

    bigrebnc1775 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    72,083
    Thanks Received:
    4,782
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Ratings:
    +10,084
    He never answered the question presented
    Does he oppose Remington being sued
    He wants it both ways
     
  8. satrebil
    Offline

    satrebil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,986
    Thanks Received:
    578
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +2,767
    Well, he actually did. Your hypothetical was "Any place that does not allow a person to lawfully carry a firearm should be sued".

    "Any place" implies, well, any place - including private property. As staunch a 2A advocate as I am, I cannot say that 2A rights should supersede property rights. I have every right to dictate who may be armed on my property. Public property is a different story.

    Damn you for making me defend this moron.
     
  9. bigrebnc1775
    Offline

    bigrebnc1775 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    72,083
    Thanks Received:
    4,782
    Trophy Points:
    1,855
    Location:
    Kannapolis, N.C.
    Ratings:
    +10,084
    I'm still not seeing where he said Remington should not be sued
    And the title should have been the guide
    If you support gun manufacturers being sued you will support this
     
  10. satrebil
    Offline

    satrebil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    1,986
    Thanks Received:
    578
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +2,767
    Sorry friend, you're simply off base on this. Remington is not being sued upon where the shooting took place, they're being sued because they manufacture guns and supposedly ran ads that encouraged mass shootings. You know and I know it's complete bullshit, but it has nothing to do with the way you framed this thread.
     

Share This Page