No...Trump didn't break the law with Ukraine funds...so stop drooling, left wingers

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by 2aguy, Jan 16, 2020.

  1. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    77,057
    Thanks Received:
    14,147
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +58,344
    No....Trump didn't break the law, but it is now obvious that democrat party activists work in the GAO...releasing this the same day Trump signs the huge Trade deal with Mexico and Canada...

    GAO: Trump violated the Impoundment Control Act in hold on Ukraine aid

    Read the whole report, however, and one finds the glaring issue with this conclusion, which is that the administration didn’t have an obligation to release the funds on any specific date in the fiscal year. All they needed to do was to make sure the money got spent by the last day of the budget cycle:

    For fiscal year 2019, Congress appropriated $250 million for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI). Pub. L. No. 115-245, § 9013, 132 Stat. at 3044–45. The funds were available “to provide assistance, including training; equipment; lethal assistance; logistics support, supplies and services; sustainment; and intelligence support to the military and national security forces of Ukraine.” Id. § 9013, 132 Stat. at 3044. The appropriation made the funds available for obligation through September 30, 2019.
    ----

    GAO rebukes the Trump administration for issuing a series of orders making the funds temporarily unavailable without any explanations for why. Had the administration not spent the funds at all, it would have been required to send a “special message” to Congress within 15 days of that decision to allow for both chambers to take action on it. The GAO also argues that those decisions have to be based on “programmatic” issues rather than policy decisions, which they mean temporary issues with the programs and processes themselves rather than policy opposition to them. That, however, is not found in the text of the ICA; in fact, it doesn’t place any effective limitation on the reason for such rescissions, emphasis mine:
    ------

    The very text of the ICA envisions such rescissions taken for reasons of “fiscal policy or other reasons,” and has no explicit limitation on reasons being “programmatic.” It even explicitly recognizes the legitimacy of canceling “authorized projects,” which is the opposite of the GAO’s definition of “programmatic.” The ICA does require the president/administration to notify Congress of those decisions, but only when the money won’t be spent within the fiscal year.

    And the key......

    In this case, the money did get spent within the budget year. The aid may not have gone out as quickly as Congress intended or as the administration first planned, but as long as it got spent, there’s no violation.
     
    • Winner Winner x 7
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. Eric Arthur Blair
    Online

    Eric Arthur Blair Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2015
    Messages:
    10,731
    Thanks Received:
    1,676
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +8,859
    The desperation is strong in these a-holes, Luke.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. 2aguy
    Offline

    2aguy Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    77,057
    Thanks Received:
    14,147
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +58,344
    And the other point?

    Even if it did, though, Congress proposed the remedy for such failures within the ICA itself, as I noted last month when the issue first got raised. The remedy is to sue the administration to force it to spend the funds, not to criminally prosecute the president over it, emphases mine:
    -----

    Under the agreement of both the executive and legislative branches in 1974, this is a civil matter, not a “high crime or misdemeanor.” It’s an absurdly picayune basis for removing an elected president, the head of a co-equal branch of government.
     
    • Informative Informative x 4
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. Eric Arthur Blair
    Online

    Eric Arthur Blair Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2015
    Messages:
    10,731
    Thanks Received:
    1,676
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +8,859
    Like I said....the desperation reeks among the "smart" party that is now digging it's own grave.
    I am very confident Jay Sekulow had all bases covered before the other team could even get off
    the bench.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. depotoo
    Offline

    depotoo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Messages:
    35,741
    Thanks Received:
    8,294
    Trophy Points:
    1,360
    Ratings:
    +25,780
    So, someone at GAO gave the Dems a talking point, which really isn’t... I wonder what they were promised or threatened with...
    The biggest scandal is...
    Sooo, if we find corruption, but money has been allocated to a country, it must go to them by a certain date regardless? Something is horrifically wrong with this picture.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. Billy_Kinetta
    Offline

    Billy_Kinetta Paladin of the Lost Hour Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    44,636
    Thanks Received:
    8,685
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Ratings:
    +56,486
    In any case, it's not a high crime or misdemeanor.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. The Irish Ram
    Offline

    The Irish Ram LITTLE GIRL / Ram Tough

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    16,366
    Thanks Received:
    3,968
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    diagonally parked in a parallel universe
    Ratings:
    +16,918
    upload_2020-1-16_14-49-58.png
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 6
    • Winner Winner x 3
  8. Augustine_
    Offline

    Augustine_ VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,898
    Thanks Received:
    135
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Nunya
    Ratings:
    +1,606
    LOLOLOL Trump broke the law, but REALLY what matters is this small little footnote that in no way shows that Trump did not break the law :lmao:
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
  9. Eric Arthur Blair
    Online

    Eric Arthur Blair Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2015
    Messages:
    10,731
    Thanks Received:
    1,676
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +8,859
    LOLOLOLOL Show everyone, Brainiac, where Trump broke the law.
    Hitch up your adult diapers and show us you are a big boy.
     
    • Winner Winner x 6
  10. Rambunctious
    Online

    Rambunctious Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    29,215
    Thanks Received:
    5,652
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +33,205
    He can't...he has TDS....
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1

Share This Page