Offical Impeachment Thread

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mascale, Nov 8, 2019.

  1. Olde Europe
    Offline

    Olde Europe Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    4,423
    Thanks Received:
    3,874
    Trophy Points:
    2,065
    Ratings:
    +12,315
    Were it not for this bombshell, we would have to assume Giuliani was freelancing for months behind Trump's back, and without Trump's knowledge. Except, Trump ordered Zelensky in his July 25 phone call to consult with Giuliani (and Barr) to get the "favor" right.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. joaquinmiller
    Offline

    joaquinmiller Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2013
    Messages:
    5,154
    Thanks Received:
    6,499
    Trophy Points:
    2,055
    Ratings:
    +23,547
    He asked for a favor. As the transcript proves. You may want to try a different line of bullshit.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Kilroy2
    Offline

    Kilroy2 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2018
    Messages:
    1,360
    Thanks Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Ratings:
    +651
    first witness wow they are already claiming victory.

    Jordan is like the guy who has sex for the first time

    Can't hold it back and save it for later

    Settle down and save the best for last but if that is all you have then I guess it is best to be done with it

    This must be the amateur hour no trial begins with the smoking gun, they built up to it

    Here what happen, the witness testified on what he had previously said

    he is not the star witness instead if we believe Jordon that it was all hearsay then why have the whistle blower testify as we already know that the whistle blower did not have first hand testimony

    So why the push for the whistle blower identify. Jordon says that hearsay is irrelevant then the whistle blower testimony must be irrelevant

    his testimony is not needed

    Instead we have the witness

    4 years service as the Ukraine ambassador appointed by George Bush

    years of experience in the state department

    West point graduate, served in Vietnam

    Served his country for 50 yeas

    IT IS UNLAWFUL TO GIVE FALSE TESTIMONY IN THIS TYPE OF HEARING

    his qualification is known as his record of service is clear

    He stated Ukraine is important as a deterrent to Russian aggression as they have been under attack for the last 5 years by Russia because they want closer ties to the west

    He has supported strong measures to deter Russian aggression

    He represented US determination to help then

    Whereas Trump as sided with Russian on various matters

    Trump has used RG to do his bidding, and RG is not a government official and as a matter of fact there are plenty of government officials who do their jobs for the benefit of the US and not a personal client

    Thus the security agreement is important for that reason

    His testimony is valid as he served in Ukraine and has enough qualifications

    two channels of communication one official and another unofficial

    why the need for 2 channels?

    is that false testimony


    he further states that he had direct communication with other government officials

    When they testify it will only collaborate what he has said from communication with others

    But you gotta wait for it
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  4. easyt65
    Offline

    easyt65 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2015
    Messages:
    56,975
    Thanks Received:
    12,423
    Trophy Points:
    2,290
    Ratings:
    +65,548
    After today's Schiff coup hearing meltdown, snowflakes began coordinating another 'SCREAM AT THE SKY' event

    [​IMG]

    :p
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. OKTexas
    Offline

    OKTexas Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    45,491
    Thanks Received:
    6,768
    Trophy Points:
    1,870
    Location:
    Near Magnolia, TX
    Ratings:
    +27,211

    He's the Ukraine President, not PM. Other than that, you are correct.

    .
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. depotoo
    Offline

    depotoo Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Messages:
    34,145
    Thanks Received:
    7,837
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Ratings:
    +24,208
    Really...
     
  7. NotYourBody
    Offline

    NotYourBody VIP Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2019
    Messages:
    1,431
    Thanks Received:
    107
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Ratings:
    +749
    You are not even close to having this correct. You clearly did not watch the hearing.

    The phone call took place at a restaurant and the staffer was present when the call was placed FROM Sondland TO Trump on July 26.

    The staffer could hear Trump's end of the conversation.

    Taylor says staffer overheard Trump ask Sondland about 'the investigations'
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. bripat9643
    Online

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    115,943
    Thanks Received:
    14,732
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +66,354
    Opinions are not admissible in court unless it's from an expert witness.
     
  9. depotoo
    Offline

    depotoo Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Messages:
    34,145
    Thanks Received:
    7,837
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Ratings:
    +24,208
    See post #1129. Video
     
  10. wamose
    Offline

    wamose Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2019
    Messages:
    2,396
    Thanks Received:
    432
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +3,072
    If Hillary went to prison for 30 years, as she deserves, do you think she'll be saying that many, many, many people are still hounding her to run for President the day she gets out?
     

Share This Page