RIP Evan Sun (aged 4)

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Tommy Tainant, May 14, 2019 at 3:50 PM.

  1. M14 Shooter
    Online

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    21,981
    Thanks Received:
    1,946
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +5,634
    Those aren't the definitions of the terms according to Ohio law.

    2903.04 Involuntary manslaughter.
    A) No person shall cause the death of another or the unlawful termination of another's pregnancy as a proximate result of the offender's committing or attempting to commit a felony.
    (B) No person shall cause the death of another or the unlawful termination of another's pregnancy as a proximate result of the offender's committing or attempting to commit a misdemeanor of any degree, a regulatory offense, or a minor misdemeanor other than a violation of any section contained in Title XLV of the Revised Code that is a minor misdemeanor
    Lawriter - ORC - 2903.04 Involuntary manslaughter.

    How is the father guilty of involuntary manslaughter?
     
  2. TheProgressivePatriot
    Online

    TheProgressivePatriot Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2015
    Messages:
    12,320
    Thanks Received:
    1,696
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    The commie infested, queer loving liberal NE USA
    Ratings:
    +7,125
    Thank you. I stand corrected. But I will add that these are extreme positions and most gun control advocates are screaming for confiscation
     
  3. M14 Shooter
    Online

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    21,981
    Thanks Received:
    1,946
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +5,634
    There's no reason for anyone to believe you anti-gun loons with stop with 'assault weapons'.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. TheProgressivePatriot
    Online

    TheProgressivePatriot Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2015
    Messages:
    12,320
    Thanks Received:
    1,696
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    The commie infested, queer loving liberal NE USA
    Ratings:
    +7,125
    Early on I stated that if there was a COMMON SENSE law on the book requiring guns to be secured he COULD HAVE been charged with violating that law.
     
  5. Markle
    Offline

    Markle Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    13,548
    Thanks Received:
    1,854
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Ratings:
    +8,442
    What "efforts are being made to reduce the violence"?

    Is "children getting guns because their parents are responsible" a major problem?
     
  6. M14 Shooter
    Online

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    21,981
    Thanks Received:
    1,946
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +5,634
    Any legal requirement for a gun owner to secure his firearms violates the Constitution.
    So now what?
     
  7. Markle
    Offline

    Markle Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    13,548
    Thanks Received:
    1,854
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Tallahassee, FL
    Ratings:
    +8,442
    Good to see that you agree that "most gun control advocates are screaming for confiscation", which is in direct opposition to our Constitution.
     
  8. TheProgressivePatriot
    Online

    TheProgressivePatriot Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2015
    Messages:
    12,320
    Thanks Received:
    1,696
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    The commie infested, queer loving liberal NE USA
    Ratings:
    +7,125
    That is your personal opinion. States and cities have passed such laws . Do you think that all forms of gun control are unconstitutional? If so on what basis?
     
  9. M14 Shooter
    Online

    M14 Shooter The Light of Truth

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    21,981
    Thanks Received:
    1,946
    Trophy Points:
    275
    Ratings:
    +5,634
    No. It is a fact of law, as ruled by the USSC in 2008.

    The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment . The District’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense. Under any of the standards of scrutiny the Court has applied to enumerated constitutional rights, this prohibition—in the place where the importance of the lawful defense of self, family, and property is most acute—would fail constitutional muster.
    Similarly, the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional.
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER

    Thus:
    Any legal requirement for a gun owner to secure his firearms violates the Constitution.
    So now what?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Likkmee
    Offline

    Likkmee Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    4,534
    Thanks Received:
    372
    Trophy Points:
    170
    Ratings:
    +2,148
    You got it M14. The punk with the badge needs some Vaseline and a cell stay.
     

Share This Page