Rumsfield's Memo

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by 5stringJeff, Oct 23, 2003.

  1. 5stringJeff

    5stringJeff Senior Member

    Sep 15, 2003
    Thanks Received:
    Trophy Points:
    Puyallup, WA
    Have you guys heard the hoopla about Rumsfield's memo? Everyone is all of a sudden saying that he is declaring the war a failure. What a crock. IMO, Rumsfield is asking all the right questions to keep from getting everyone bogged down in a particular mindset.
    Here is the full text of the memo:

    October 16, 2003

    TO: Gen. Dick Myers
    Paul Wolfowitz
    Gen. Pete Pace
    Doug Feith

    FROM: Donald Rumsfeld

    SUBJECT: Global War on Terrorism

    The questions I posed to combatant commanders this week were: Are we winning or losing the Global War on Terror? Is DoD changing fast enough to deal with the new 21st century security environment? Can a big institution change fast enough? Is the USG changing fast enough?

    DoD has been organized, trained and equipped to fight big armies, navies and air forces. It is not possible to change DoD fast enough to successfully fight the global war on terror; an alternative might be to try to fashion a new institution, either within DoD or elsewhere — one that seamlessly focuses the capabilities of several departments and agencies on this key problem.

    With respect to global terrorism, the record since Septermber 11th seems to be:

    We are having mixed results with Al Qaida, although we have put considerable pressure on them — nonetheless, a great many remain at large.

    USG has made reasonable progress in capturing or killing the top 55 Iraqis.

    USG has made somewhat slower progress tracking down the Taliban — Omar, Hekmatyar, etc.

    With respect to the Ansar Al-Islam, we are just getting started.

    Have we fashioned the right mix of rewards, amnesty, protection and confidence in the US?

    Does DoD need to think through new ways to organize, train, equip and focus to deal with the global war on terror?

    Are the changes we have and are making too modest and incremental? My impression is that we have not yet made truly bold moves, although we have have made many sensible, logical moves in the right direction, but are they enough?

    Today, we lack metrics to know if we are winning or losing the global war on terror. Are we capturing, killing or deterring and dissuading more terrorists every day than the madrassas and the radical clerics are recruiting, training and deploying against us?

    Does the US need to fashion a broad, integrated plan to stop the next generation of terrorists? The US is putting relatively little effort into a long-range plan, but we are putting a great deal of effort into trying to stop terrorists. The cost-benefit ratio is against us! Our cost is billions against the terrorists' costs of millions.

    Do we need a new organization?

    How do we stop those who are financing the radical madrassa schools?

    Is our current situation such that "the harder we work, the behinder we get"?

    It is pretty clear that the coalition can win in Afghanistan and Iraq in one way or another, but it will be a long, hard slog.

    Does CIA need a new finding?

    Should we create a private foundation to entice radical madradssas to a more moderate course?

    What else should we be considering?

    Please be prepared to discuss this at our meeting on Saturday or Monday.

  2. jimnyc

    jimnyc ...

    Aug 28, 2003
    Thanks Received:
    Trophy Points:
    New York
    My thoughts exactly, Jeff. I was reserving comment until I read the entire memo as the sites I read about it on just posted excerpts.
  3. Robert Espy

    Robert Espy Guest

    I love it -- not the memo but the ado being made by the media/left regarding it. Seems to me that the only ones that really get it are those in the Bush Administration, and Bill Clinton (who, figuring out the real purpose of the leak, countered by praising Rummy!)

    Nothing up MY sleeve!

Share This Page