... Strzok cited for misconduct, security violation and ‘exceptionally poor judgment’ in FBI memos

Discussion in 'Politics' started by The Purge, Nov 19, 2019.

  1. The Purge
    Offline

    The Purge BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2018
    Messages:
    13,788
    Thanks Received:
    3,973
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +20,424
    John Solomon Reports ^ | 11/19/19 |

    Full title: "Russia case agent Strzok cited for misconduct, security violation and ‘exceptionally poor judgment’ in FBI memos"

    This summer, ex-FBI agent Peter Strzok filed a lawsuit suggesting his firing was political retribution for having run the bureau’s counterintelligence investigation into the now debunked allegations that Donald Trump and Russia colluded to hijack the 2016 election.

    The Justice Department has responded to the lawsuit in a big way, releasing to the court presiding over the civil case Strzok’s official misconduct file that concluded the former FBI supervisor exhibited “a gross lack of professionalism and exceptionally poor judgment.”

    It shows the FBI substantiated that Strzok had engaged in dereliction of duty, had committed misconduct through the expression of anti-Trump bias on his official FBI phone and committed security violations by performing official government work on personal email.

    The records show one official recommended termination, and another recommended suspension for 60 days without pay. The bureau leadership chose the more severe of the two penalties, terminating Strzok last year.

    The dereliction of duty citation involved Strzok’s failure, according to the FBI, to quickly follow up in fall 2016 after the belated discovery of a trove of Hillary Clinton emails on a laptop belonging to former Congressman Anthony Weiner and his wife, Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

    Strzok was supervising the investigation of whether Clinton’s use of personal email for classified State Department matters created a security risk, and his failure caused an unnecessary delay to evaluate the new evidence just weeks before Election Day, the FBI concluded.

    The disciplinary file included testimony from one of Strzok’s colleagues, a fellow agent, about the failure to respond to the discovery of emails. “The crickets I was hearing was making me uncomfortable because something was going to come crashing down,” the agent testified. “….I still to this day don’t understand what the hell went wrong.”

    The agent testified he feared “somebody was not acting appropriately, somebody was trying to bury this” discovery of new Clinton email evidence, the files show.

    Strzok offered a bevy of excuses for his inaction, including he was busy working the Trump-Russia case at the time. All were rejected. “The investigation reveals that there is no reasonable excuse for the FBI’s delay in following up on this matter,” the disciplinary file concluded.

    The FBI also cited Strzok for a violation of security protocols for conducting bureau business on personal email and personal devices, putting his sensitive counterintelligence work at risk of compromise.

    “The investigation uncovered numerous occasions in which you used your personal email account,” the final findings concluded.

    But the disciplinary letter to Strzok that preceded his firing saved its harshest words for his expression of anti-Trump bias in official government text messages with FBI lawyer Lisa Page while they were having an affair.

    The disciplinary file shows the FBI believed Strzok’s political statements on his official government phone while overseeing the Russia collusion and Clinton email probe may have caused the bureau its most lasting damage.

    The letter cited pages of the most egregious texts where Strzok and Page railed against Trump and even suggested they would use their powers to have “an insurance policy” or to “stop him” from becoming president.

    “Your excessive, repeated and politically charged text messages, while you were assigned as the lead case agent on the FBI’s two biggest and most politically sensitive investigations in decades, demonstrated a gross lack of professionalism and exceptionally poor judgment,” the FBI wrote Strzok.

    “Your misconduct cast a pall over the FBI’s Clinton email and Russia investigations and the work of the Special Counsel. The immeasurable harm done to the reputation of the FBI will not be easily overcome,” the letter added.

    ----------

    “Your excessive, repeated and politically charged text messages, while you were assigned as the lead case agent on the FBI’s two biggest and most politically sensitive investigations in decades, demonstrated a gross lack of professionalism and exceptionally poor judgment,” the FBI wrote Strzok.

    “Your misconduct cast a pall over the FBI’s Clinton email and Russia investigations and the work of the Special Counsel. The immeasurable harm done to the reputation of the FBI will not be easily overcome,” the letter added.

    Was Strzok the problem, or was he only a symptom of the overall anti-Trump sentiment within the FBI that persists to this day?

    I find it almost impossible to believe that the FBI - who are trained to observe behaviors in other people - failed to pick up on Strzok's anti-Trump opinions before the DOJ IG released the Strzok-Page text messages.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. kyzr
    Offline

    kyzr Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    10,573
    Thanks Received:
    2,022
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +9,940
    The upper FBI management were probably all Trump-Haters, so Strzok's animosity was just expected behavior in Comey's FBI.
    I'd like to see most of the upper FBI's text messages, not just Strzok and Page.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. JGalt
    Offline

    JGalt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    23,119
    Thanks Received:
    5,059
    Trophy Points:
    380
    Location:
    Somewhere you're not
    Ratings:
    +34,119
    Strzok is the first one to fall under AG Barr's hammer of justice. Actually he got off far easier than I would have wanted.

    Who's next?
     
  4. Syriusly
    Offline

    Syriusly Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2014
    Messages:
    52,602
    Thanks Received:
    6,593
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +20,965
    Yeah- his sentence is pretty severe........
     
  5. JGalt
    Offline

    JGalt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    23,119
    Thanks Received:
    5,059
    Trophy Points:
    380
    Location:
    Somewhere you're not
    Ratings:
    +34,119
    He got his sorry ass fired, didn't he?

    That's ok, he can always beg for Clapper's spot on CNN after the FEDs frog-march him out of the building.
     

Share This Page