The crackpots and cultists of catastrophic climate change

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Ringtone, Oct 14, 2019.

  1. Ringtone
    Offline

    Ringtone Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2019
    Messages:
    946
    Thanks Received:
    175
    Trophy Points:
    45
    Ratings:
    +1,065
    The hypocrisy, the insanity, the virtue-signaling, the lies, the fools, the hate, the viciousness. . . .

     
    • Winner Winner x 6
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. Bo Didleysquat
    Offline

    Bo Didleysquat Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2019
    Messages:
    2,062
    Thanks Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Ratings:
    +736
    What does the Pentagon say on the matter? What did the fossil fuel industry's research begin revealing as early as the 1980s?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. abu afak
    Offline

    abu afak ALLAH SNACKBAR!

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,926
    Thanks Received:
    616
    Trophy Points:
    315
    Ratings:
    +2,164
    Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

    "Opposing" (the AGW Consensus)

    Since 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[29] NO national or international scientific body any longer rejects the findings of human-induced effects on climate change.[28][30]

    Surveys of scientists and scientific literature

    Various surveys have been conducted to evaluate scientific opinion on global warming. They have concluded that the majority of scientists support the idea of anthropogenic climate change.

    In 2004, the geologist and historian of science Naomi Oreskes summarized a study of the scientific literature on climate change.[131] She analyzed 928 abstracts of papers from refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 and concluded that there is a scientific consensus on the reality of anthropogenic climate change.

    Oreskes divided the abstracts into six categories: explicit endorsement of the consensus position, evaluation of impacts, mitigation proposals, methods, paleoclimate analysis, and rejection of the consensus position. 75% of the abstracts were placed in the first three categories (either explicitly or implicitly accepting the consensus view); 25% dealt with methods or paleoclimate, thus taking no position on current anthropogenic climate change.

    None of the abstracts disagreed with the consensus position, which the author found to be "remarkable".
    According to the report, "authors evaluating impacts, developing methods, or studying paleoclimatic change might believe that current climate change is natural. However, none of these papers argued that point."....".

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change


    `​
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    19,774
    Thanks Received:
    4,256
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +21,728
    That CO2 was a follower of temp change and that it can not drive anything...
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. Bo Didleysquat
    Offline

    Bo Didleysquat Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2019
    Messages:
    2,062
    Thanks Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Ratings:
    +736
    Love to see it, thanks it advance, The Reality America Show won't last, the antidote will come and the planet will go right on evolving, it has no need for hominids whatsoever. Watch. You'll be shatting yourself over migrations the rest of your life.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. Ringtone
    Offline

    Ringtone Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2019
    Messages:
    946
    Thanks Received:
    175
    Trophy Points:
    45
    Ratings:
    +1,065
    Hatred of humanity. Death cult. Hysterical nonsense.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. Fort Fun Indiana
    Offline

    Fort Fun Indiana Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2017
    Messages:
    32,148
    Thanks Received:
    2,033
    Trophy Points:
    1,155
    Ratings:
    +14,537
    Who to believe...an uneducated, religious slob, or the global scientific community...

    Tough call...
     
  8. Fort Fun Indiana
    Offline

    Fort Fun Indiana Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2017
    Messages:
    32,148
    Thanks Received:
    2,033
    Trophy Points:
    1,155
    Ratings:
    +14,537
    False.
     
  9. Bo Didleysquat
    Offline

    Bo Didleysquat Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2019
    Messages:
    2,062
    Thanks Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Ratings:
    +736
    Those who cage migrants in concentration camps are our salvation; no soap or toothpaste for the kids, I hear MS-13 recruits in utero.
     
  10. ReinyDays
    Online

    ReinyDays Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2019
    Messages:
    428
    Thanks Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Ratings:
    +202
    At this rate ... we'll tie up all the electrons in the universe with the internet ... then where will we be? ...
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1

Share This Page