Discussion in 'History' started by mikegriffith1, Aug 10, 2019.
It won’t help.
This thread is the biggest joke on this board. I see a bunch of Google University Professors here. Masters of Google
Tehran should be the new Nagasaki.
Yes! Our criminal government needs to kill as many innocent women and children as possible. It’s the American Way!
You, W, and Ellen must be great friends. LOL
And here I thought only France was populated by surrender monkey!
Let’s see? Surrendering and mass murdering innocents could only be considered the same thing, by a blood thirsty statist.
The Japanese refused to surrender after Hiroshima. Even after Nagasaki, the emperor's recorded surrender had to be smuggled out of the imperial palace as the war council STILL wanted to fight.
I lived in Japan for years. I was born there. Among my neighbors in Sakai were a pair of sisters who were children during the war, living in the rubble of Osaka. And yet at the age 6 and 9, these young girls were being trained to use bamboo spears to attack the US marines as they landed on the shores of the Kansai region. That was *before* Nagasaki or Hiroshima.
The idea that the Japanese would have meekly surrendered without Nagaski and Hiroshima is poorly supported.
With the casualty estimates for a land invasion were orders of magnitude higher than Nagasaki and Hiroshima combined. And yet, rather than a protracted invasion killing hundreds of thousands of our own troops and millions of the Japanese (most likely including 6 year old Mariko and 9 year old Mizuho still clutching their bamboo spears) in a conflict that could have gone for YEARS....
.......weeks after Nagasaki we began delivering food and supplies to the Japanese people.
That’s not funny.
Amazing that people can be so eager to parrot 70 year old propaganda.
Or.....are merely aware of the facts.
Separate names with a comma.